Shop Now Let me get clear about your beliefs. How old do you believe the Earth is? And how do you debunk carbon dating? Dinosaur bones have been dated, based on the half life of certain elements, at millions of years. The earliest human remains found are nowhere near that old. Also, in the bible there is no reference to dinosaurs. I would think that a creature of such threat to life and sheer size would be mentioned, at least in passing. Perhaps I am not familiar with the passage that clearly describes man walking amongst dinosaurs. Matt USA Let me get clear about your beliefs.
Cocktails! C14, DNA, collagen in dinosaurs indicates geological timescales are false
Kuban last revised Aug. I use this format to avoid webbot spamming Fig. Brown’s website and book showing what he calls the “Rupture Phase of the Flood” Introduction Walter Brown, a young-earth creationist and retired mechanical engineer, has developed a “Flood model”1 which he believes accounts for virtually all geologic evidence on earth, as well as a variety of astronomical phenomena.
How radiometric dating works in general: Radioactive elements decay gradually into other elements. The original element is called the parent, and the result of the decay process is .
Senior research scientist Alexander Cherkinsky specializes in the preparation of samples for Carbon testing. He directed the pretreatment and processing of the dinosaur bone samples with the Accelerator Mass Spectrometer, though he did not know the bones were from dinosaurs, and he signed the reports. Carbon dating at this facility is certainly the very best. But in , someone told the director of the facility, Jeff Speakman, that the Paleochronology group was showing the Carbon reports on a website and YouTube and drawing the obvious conclusions.
So when he received another bone sample from the Paleochronology group, he returned it to sender and sent an email saying: The scientists at CAIS and I are dismayed by the claims that you and your team have made with respect to the age of the Earth and the validity of biological evolution. Consequently, we are no longer able to provide radiocarbon services in support of your anti-scientific agenda.
Walter Brown’s “Hydroplate” Flood Model Doesn’t Hold Water
J A Oh, and darn dragons is really insightful right. Kim Sorry I offended u. Personally, we are saddened by your lack of education. Kim I am from the south. Actually northern Oregon, however u wanna look at it. I barely finished law school.
Bones can’t be dated with the potassium/argon method, Bill. Only igneous rock can be dated that way. Now, parts of the geological formation in which the fossils were found have been dated by various radiometric methods, and the consensus is that the rocks themselves are million years old.
This subject provides an insightful look into the equivocating nature of the evolutionist. The number one response I read after reports of discoveries of dinosaur proteins is: They are the same peptide bonds that make up proteins. Evolutionists will kick and scream that nobody found proteins on a dinosaur fossil, even after being shown the study where the researchers repeatedly state they discovered collagen and osteocyte-like protein structures on a supposedly 70 MY Mosasaur fossil.
The denial from evolutionists is quite a thing to behold. The media could certainly cover science and evolution a lot better, but not by giving cranks a venue to espouse their cranky ideas 4 scordova July 6, at 6: Very ancient as determined by whom? Your statement implicitly defends the samples via circular reasoning, not hard nosed empiricism. The Darwinist reasoning goes like this: Fossils are old because we find them in old strata.
Your quote is exhibit A — acceptance via circular reasoning, not hard-nosed empirical evidence from physics and chemistry like: So, forgetting everything else, what would happen if you dated a 65 million year old bone or some tissue from inside the bone? We have many depositis containing non-avian dinosaur bones that are sandwiched between volcanic layers that can be accurately dated. If it does not entirely contradict them, we put it in a footnote.
How do scientists determine the age of dinosaur bones?
Why is c 14 dating used in dating dinosaur bones Radiocarbon Dating of Dinosaur Fossils The preferred method of dating dinosaur fossils is with the radiometric dating method. And the result of this accepted method dates dinosaur fossils to around 68 million years old. Consider the C decay rate. The theoretical limit for C dating isyears using AMS, but for practical purposes it is 45, to 55, years.
Verse 18, His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron. This fellow has big heavy-duty bones, and they do. The picture shown with my knuckle and a tape measure in figure is the toe bone of a brachiosaurus.
Tweet NaturalNews A recent archaeological discovery that throws a wrench into the conventional theory of evolution has reportedly cost a California professor his job. Mark Armitage, a former scientist at California State University, Northridge CSUN , was reportedly fired after claiming to have unearthed a dinosaur fossil that still contains soft, flexible tissue, suggesting that it can’t be millions of years old. A year veteran in his field, Armitage has published many studies over the years in peer-reviewed journals.
One of his most recent was published last July, pertaining to a discovery he made at the Hell Creek Formation excavation site in Montana. According to The Christian Post, Armitage was evaluating a triceratops horn fossil when he came across preserved soft tissue. A lawsuit recently filed in Armitage’s defense describes his reaction to the discovery as “fascinated,” since flexible matter has never before been discovered on a dinosaur fossil.
Naturally, Armitage published his findings — in this case, he published them in the Elsevier journal Acta Histochemica — and proceeded to share his findings with his students. Not long after, Armitage was approached by a CSUN faculty head who reportedly shouted at him, “We are not going to tolerate your religion in this department! This should be a wakeup call and warning to the entire world of academia.
In a story published by The Huffington Post, Stephanie Pappas explained that iron in dinosaurs’ blood may have a preservative effect on soft tissue. According to the report, Schweitzer and her colleagues had discovered soft tissue in the fossilized leg of a Tyrannosaurus rex, which she says was unusually soft and still transparent for being supposedly 68 million years old. But because its free radical oxidation potential can have an effect similar to formaldehyde, the chemical used in embalming, iron in the creature’s blood may have preserved the soft tissue in ways previously undiscovered.
At the same time, Schweitzer’s explanation for the preservation of soft tissue on dinosaur bones is still just a theory, and one that supporters of Armitage say ignores the presence of radioactive carbon in dinosaur fossils. Carbon C dating of dinosaur bones collected from many different sites across the U.
One more step
Here, RSR presents the scientific journals reporting, the kinds of biological material found so far, and the dinosaurs yielding up these exciting discoveries: Nature, Science, PNAS, PLoS One, Proceedings of the Royal Society, Bone, Acta Histochemica, the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, Proteome Research, and others below in our chronological catalog , “the web’s most complete list of dinosaur soft tissue discoveries,” as published in many leading journals, according to a co-author of one of those papers.
Dinosaur and Dinosaur-Layer Creatures:
Dinosaurs became extinct about 65 million years ago, long before any humans existed. The reason why scientists who study dinosaurs reached this conclusion is radiometric dating of the rocks in which dinosaurs fossils are found.
Are the results a confirmation of rapid formation of the geologic column as modern sedimentology studies have predicted? The discovery of collagen in a Tyrannosaurus-rex dinosaur femur bone was recently reported in the journal Science. Radiocarbon dating, dinosaur, bone collagen, organic carbon, bone bio-apatite, fossil wood, amber, megafauna Introduction Bone collagen and soft tissue were recently reported as having been discovered in a Tyrannosaurus dinosaur femur bone as well as other fossil bones from the Cretaceous period of the geologic column by Mary H.
Libby, the inventor of the radiocarbon dating method, “There is no known natural mechanism by which collagen may be altered to yield a false age. The data was challenged by Thomas Stafford as poor science due to assumed contamination from modern C with younger surficial calcium carbonate. Bone bio-apatite can be unreliable due to potential contamination from calcium carbonate replacement containing modern or dead carbon [unless carefully pretreated].
However, a study of the cm. The age of the clay was estimated to be between , years old by J.
Did Humans Walk the Earth With Dinosaurs? Triceratops Horn Dated to 33,500 Years
Carbon 14 is used for this example: This nullifies the carbon method as well as demonstrating that the earth is less than 10, years old. The above is offered as a simple fact of research.
Introducing Cheat Happens CoSMOS, a new self-service gamehacking tool designed from the ground up for a new makes it easy and fun to hack your own PC games while waiting for our programming team to release new and updated trainers.
These formations may have resulted from carcass burial in an anoxic environment with minimal bacteria, thus slowing decomposition. Stromatolites Lower Proterozoic Stromatolites from Bolivia , South America Stromatolites are layered accretionary structures formed in shallow water by the trapping, binding and cementation of sedimentary grains by biofilms of microorganisms , especially cyanobacteria.
While older, Archean fossil remains are presumed to be colonies of cyanobacteria , younger that is, Proterozoic fossils may be primordial forms of the eukaryote chlorophytes that is, green algae. One genus of stromatolite very common in the geologic record is Collenia. The earliest stromatolite of confirmed microbial origin dates to 2.
The most widely supported explanation is that stromatolite builders fell victims to grazing creatures the Cambrian substrate revolution , implying that sufficiently complex organisms were common over 1 billion years ago. Factors such as the chemistry of the environment may have been responsible for changes.